i have NEVER in my life met a sharp attorney. here we go again. Divorce 101. 1. you should have never been allowed by the courts to keep a house that. show more i have NEVER in my life met a sharp attorney. here we go again. Divorce 101.
1. you should have never been allowed by the courts to keep a house that has a mortgage with a person you are no longer married to. you should have been given 60-90 days to produce a valid loan approval and close on YOUR new mortgage. or the courts should have ordered the home sold.
2. the cost to re-fi should have been spelled out in your divorce decree.
3. Sue your lawyer for the cost.
**the deed does not mean Jack Squat. so what if he signed it. a deed is not a mortgage. to me, in this case a deed is a worthless piece of toilet paper. ok, well it
only means he can't change the locks on your front door, that is the only credit due that i will give this worthless piece of paper.
*Look at him signing the deed this way. "he now has no ownership interest in the house, but is obligated to a 30 year prison sentence. kind of like drinking an O'Doul's, nothing like having the full bloated feeling without the high."
** ex husband has a mortgage ok, he is filing BK, ok.
his credit/debt is going to be flushed, (if it's a 7) ok. hence, the mortgage that he is Legally required to pay, ok.
**personally if i were the ex husband i would sue You (you for holding his credit hostage) and your lawyer and his lawyer.
**only FHA loans are assumable. assumed by You not him. it is the exact same rate and term that is assumed.
is this an FHA loan?
TRIXIE · 6 years ago