Last time around, we went through the process of how to raise capital for your new hedge fund – and, more importantly, why you probably won’t be able to start your own fund…
Unless you already have a proven track record… on a great team… with excellent connections to institutional investors.
But assuming that you meet all of those requirements and that you’re daring enough to quit your job and launch your own fund, you need to lock down your investment strategies next.
One small problem, though: if you don’t already have a solid set of strategies, you should not even be thinking about starting your own fund.
Here’s what else we’ll cover this time around:
- How to demonstrate that your strategy is scalable and repeatable.
- The key structure to use with investment case studies and investor pitches.
- How the valuation and modeling work differs at your own fund.
- Why you’ll encounter some very thorny issues when it comes to “information gathering” and channel checks .
Q: I think the most common question is simply how you come up with investment strategies in the first place.
A: If you’re asking that question, immediately give up on starting your own hedge fund right now.
People who start their own funds have been drawn to the markets since they were children; they spend their free time thinking about investing and coming up with ways to exploit market inefficiencies.
So you should be starting your own fund because you already have your own strategies in mind and need the capital and team to execute them – not the other way around.
If you are not passionate to the point of stubbornness about your views of the market, why they’re different from everyone else’s, and why you’re in a unique position to profit from that, then you should not start your own fund.
If your plan is to look at the same companies everyone else is looking at and use the same models with slight tweaks, there are lots of places where you can do that. And there’s nothing wrong with having a relatively stable job with better hours and limited upside and downside.
But it’s completely the wrong approach and philosophy for your own fund.
Q: OK, so let’s say you do already have ideas from your own trading and from your work experience.
How do you prove that they’re scalable / repeatable when pitching these ideas to potential LPs?
A: We covered the structure of a pitch last time around, but essentially you have to explain why the market is, in fact, not efficient.
Quants have it easier here because they can take their strategy, retro-fit it to market data going back years or decades, and then show the returns this strategy would have generated over time (there are flaws with that approach, of course, but at least they can point to numbers).
If you’re not pitching a quant strategy, though, you need case studies and examples of both successful and unsuccessful investments.
These case studies need to show why your view of the market presents opportunities and why you’re capable of taking advantage of those opportunities.
You will also need to discuss your risk management strategy, hedging, and leverage, and why each of those makes sense in light of your overall strategy.
Here are a few examples of case studies / examples you might present for different strategies:
- Long / Short Equity: Examples of stock picks that performed well. ones that did not perform as well, and even ones where you lost money.
- Global Macro: Examples of investments in commodities or FX (or anything else in this category) that performed well, and ones that didn’t perform well or ones where you lost money.
- Distressed / Special Situations: The same idea, but now for investments in distressed companies’ debt or equity.
- Merger Arbitrage and Event-Driven: Similar, but now you have to cite specific M&A deals, IPOs, spin-offs, and other events that you bet for or against, what the end result was, and why.
Q: Great, so what should these case studies and examples include?
A: First, note that the structure is NOT the same as what you’ve covered on hedge fund stock pitches – those are more for potential ideas you present in job interviews, whereas these are for previous ideas you’ve executed (or even ideas you’ve passed on).
The structure is similar regardless of whether it’s a positive or negative case study – here’s a quick example:
- The Idea: “This healthcare company was undervalued because one division was dragging down earnings, and we thought there was a significant chance of a divestiture because of new competitors entering the market and increased pricing pressure, so we invested and expected to realize a gain within 12 months.”
- How You Developed the Idea: You witnessed a similar event in a completely different industry, and then realized that undervalued companies with under-performing divisions might exist elsewhere – and that certain industries were more likely to come under pricing pressure than others.
- The Work You Did on the Idea: You went back 5 years and analyzed the financials, valuation multiples, and market conditions of all similar cases (a divestiture of an under-performing division driven by competitive pricing pressure); based on that, you found 10 rules of thumb you could use to identify cases where there was an 80% likelihood of a company’s stock price appreciating upon announcement of a divestiture.
- The Result: You invested in the company, and, as expected, it did end up announcing a divestiture within the next 12 months. However, its stock price only rose by 5% rather than the 10-15% that your analysis had predicted, and you sold off your position for a modest gain.
- How You Applied the Results and What You Learned: Your thinking was not entirely off-base here, but you had underestimated the impact of new regulations introduced in the sector, which accounted for the difference. As a result of that, the company’s earnings growth was dampened anyway and the divestiture did not result in as much uplift as you expected. In the future, you decided to focus on sectors that were more lightly regulated,
such as [Name Examples]. and you demonstrated the viability of your strategy by… [You could go into case studies demonstrating this point here].
Q: Great. I’m assuming that it’s also a good idea to highlight ideas where you lost a significant amount… if you can explain why and how you applied the results to future investments.
A: Yes, exactly. If it’s a case where something completely random happened, then it may not be worth bringing up because you’ll just get questions you can’t answer.
I also kept track of ideas I passed on. just to see whether or not I was right.
You can even present these types of “non-investments” as case studies and use the same structure – explain why you ended up passing, what the result was, and how your correct or incorrect decision influenced your future strategies (Bessemer Ventures has some fun with this idea in their “anti-portfolio” ).
And then, of course, when you’re actually at your own fund you should also do a post-mortem analysis of all your investments.
You’re not doing everything above just for pitching purposes – you need it to improve your own performance as an investor.
The same framework applies even for quant funds or global macro funds. The investments will be different, but the structure is the same.
Strategic Strategy Picking
Q: Do you think there’s any merit to picking different strategies because you’re at a start-up fund?
In other words, are certain strategies easier or more difficult to implement when you don’t have much capital?
A: Not really, no.
People will argue that quant strategies are more “capital-intensive,” and that value-oriented strategies are “capital-light and SEC-filing-reading-heavy,” so it may be in your interest to pick something less capital-intensive at first.
I don’t agree with that, though, because you should pick the strategy you know the best and the one that you can implement most successfully.
So don’t suddenly switch to merger arbitrage ideas just because you think it’s “easier” to get started with those.
One point to keep in mind, though, is that some strategies are more scalable and repeatable than others.
Going back to the example I just gave, you could also argue that quant strategies are more scalable because they’re algorithm-driven, whereas something that involves combing through SEC filings is extremely labor-intensive and therefore more difficult to scale.
These points shouldn’t influence the strategy you choose; I’m bringing them up because they will influence how you pitch the strategy and the questions you’ll receive from potential investors.
Q: What type of technical / modeling / valuation work do you do at your own fund?
A: It’s completely dependent on your strategy, but if you’ve worked at a bank or anywhere else in finance and you know accounting, how to value companies, and how to analyze transactions, it’s the same type of work here.
If your strategy is dependent on opportunistic short-selling, you’ll have to spend more time on analyzing surrounding events and catalysts and also how to hedge yourself in the much more severe “downside case” there.
On the other hand, if you’re doing distressed investing, you’ll have to focus more on valuation and predicting the timeline for getting out of bankruptcy or the threat of bankruptcy (or whether the company will just go down in flames).
And then you must think about what the company might look like in Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 11 vs. asset sale vs. entire-company-sale scenarios.
The main difference is that unlike in banking, you actually care about the numbers and you spend a lot more time on data gathering .
There is also a big difference between hedge funds and mutual funds. mutual funds don’t have the same level of pressure to perform since they’re judged relative to the market, so you won’t see people going to extreme lengths to gather data.
Q: Entertain me for a second here… what do you mean by “extreme lengths”?
A: Two examples I can give you:
- One multi-billion dollar hedge fund I know of focused on the consumer retail sector, and they actually ran focus groups to get views on companies’ products. So they hired outside firms to bring in customers and give them direct feedback on the company’s products.
- A commodities-focused fund I know of hired helicopters to fly over the Midwest of the US to get a better read on pipeline storage and activity.
When you’re first starting out and you have $100 million or less in AUM, these types of activities will be beyond your budget.
But the point is that you’re creative and willing to use tools from other industries to understand your investments better.
Q: You bring up some interesting examples there – but where do you draw the line between legal “information gathering” and illegal insider trading?
A: The truth is that the SEC’s rules on insider trading aren’t black-and-white.
For example, expert networks were endorsed by lawyers and compliance experts until the SEC decided they veered too much into illegal activity.
Anyone can go and visit a company’s stores, contact their suppliers, or speak generally with industry experts; on the other hand, you can’t get the FDA’s or FTC’s unannounced decision on something by bribing officials.
Beyond that, I can’t really give specific guidelines or rules because it wouldn’t be appropriate to give legal advice on your site.
But due to Dodd-Frank, all hedge funds over $150 million in AUM must have compliance officers now so you will have to think through these issues early on.
And as we’re speaking, many of these regulations haven’t even been written into specific laws yet, so there’s more to come…
Q: Great news for lawyers and bad news for the rest of us, I suppose.
A: Yeah, but what else is new?
Coming Up Next
In Part 3, we delve into how to hire your staff and build an organization at your own hedge fund…
And then in Part 4, we jump into the exit opportunities – what to do if things don’t go well or if you part ways with your existing team.
Complete Series – How to Start Your Own Hedge Fund: