Where is Obama's Birth Certificate? (Part 1)
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers” Along with Millions of Americans, not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot's fight! By JB Williams
Saturday, August 1, 2009
The label of “birther” is fast becoming a noble badge of honor for millions of Americans who are not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot’s fight!
The leftist Obama propaganda press would love for you to believe that “birthers” are just a bunch of “crazy racists” that number in the hundreds, and that they have NO basis to demand proof of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama really is…
But the “birthers” actually number in the millions and the basis for their demands were set in stone by the men who wrote and ratified the US Constitution. If millions of American “birthers” are “right-wing nuts,” they are in good company with men like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Ben Franklin.
Obama has been running from his entire past all of his political life. His many minions in the press have been running interference every step of the way.
For the record, the following Obama records remain under lock and key, more than two years into public demands for Obama “transparency"… and Obama has spent a reported $1 Million in legal fees to keep them SEALED!
Obama’s official birth records -SEALED
His Occidental College records -SEALED
His Columbia College records -SEALED
His Harvard College records -SEALED
His College Thesis -SEALED
His Harvard Law Review articles -SEALED
His Indonesia Adoption records -SEALED
His Passport file -SEALED
His connection to countless foreign and domestic thugs -SEALED
Yet the American press, now to include Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly, insist that they somehow inherently know with absolute certainty, that Barack Hussein Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, a “natural born citizen,” not just “a citizen” or a “native citizen,” and that millions of Americans who think he should provide a minimum level of proof, are just “crazy” -"racists" or possibly even “potential domestic terrorists” as Obama’s Department of Homeland Security recently suggested.
Since ALL Obama records remain SEALED, what files did O’Reilly and others investigate in order to draw their absolute conclusion that Obama is legit and millions of Americans are nuts?
What’s all of the stink about?
US Law establishes that while there are several ways one can become a US citizen, there are actually only three different types of US Citizens with three very different sets of qualifications and citizen rights.
A US Citizen
A Native Born Citizen
A Natural Born Citizen
Today, we have to add one more category, the “illegal” US citizen. But that story is for another day.
A foreign born immigrant, who has successfully navigated the naturalization process, is a legal US citizen with all of the Constitutional rights afforded a US Citizen with the exception of one, the right to be President of the United States. As a matter of Constitutional case law, - 94 ”Whatever the term ‘’natural born’’ means, it no doubt does not include a person who is
In this regard, the issue of Obama’s adoption by Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro is also of consequence, as Obama could only be a US citizen by way of “naturalization.” There is no record of Obama naturalizing as a U.S. citizen upon returning from Indonesia.
All of this is at the heart of the debate over where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. His family and friends say that he was born in Kenya. His political allies say that he was born in Hawaii, our fiftieth state. Obama has stated that he was born in Hawaii and he has presented as proof, THREE different Certifications of Live Birth (COLBs) [ NOT the same as a Certificate of Live Birth ] and he has named TWO different hospitals located in Hawaii, as his official place of birth.
But since he has refused to open up his official birth records in Hawaii, nobody knows for certain where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. Contrary to leftist attempts to spin, the mere fact that such a constitutional requirement exists implies that one must provide proof of compliance, if and when asked to do so.
NOTE: One can be a US citizen without being a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen.” It must also be stated that Hawaii issued Certifications of Live Birth to foreign born non-citizens of the US as a regular practice.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was indeed born in Hawaii, and this can be verified by authenticating his official birth records alleged to exist in Hawaii, then he could be a “US Citizen” and maybe even a “Native Born Citizen” having been born on American soil. To date, no such evidence has been made available for purposes of authentication.
However, one can be both a “US citizen” and a “Native Born citizen” and still NOT be a “Natural Born Citizen.”
As an example, what are often referred to as “anchor babies” are both US citizens and Native Born citizens as a matter of federal law. But as a matter of the US Constitution, specifically Article II -Section I, they are NOT a “natural born citizen” as their parents were NOT citizens of the U.S.
NOTE: Barack Hussein Obama I, Obama’s legal birth father was NOT a US citizen. He was a British subject and a legal citizen of Kenya. Under “natural law” at the foundation of the “natural born citizen” clause, a blood descendent will inherit by way of natural law, the fathers name and citizenship, no matter where they were born.
Until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, all Presidents since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States, a descendent of parents who were both US citizens.
Why the Founders were “Birthers”
It was the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”
They based this clause on the following; “Congress, in which a number of Framers sat, provided in the Naturalization act of 1790 that ‘’the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea. shall be considered as natural born citizens. ’’ 96 This phrasing followed the literal terms of British statutes, beginning in 1350, under which persons born abroad, whose parents were both British subjects, would enjoy the same rights of inheritance as those born in England; beginning with laws in 1709 and 1731, these statutes expressly provided that such persons were natural-born subjects of the crown.”
So, had both of Obama’s parents been US citizens, he would indeed be a “natural born citizen” of the US, even if he had been born in Kenya. By way of “natural law,” he inherited the name and citizenship of his father, in Kenya, not the US.
As his father was not a US citizen, but rather a citizen of Kenya, Obama inherited by birthright, natural law, his fathers name and citizenship. He is NOT a “natural born citizen” of the US, no matter where he was born.
The Founders exempted themselves from the “natural born citizen” clause because at the time of ratification, there were no “natural born citizens,” - US citizens born to two parents who were both US citizens.
But from President Martin Van Buren on, US born descendents of two US citizens did exist and up until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, those who became president passed the “natural born citizen” requirement in the Constitution.
Clearly, the Founders were very serious “birthers.” But why were they “birthers?” What were they so worried about?
Dual or Divided Loyalties
The president of the United States has unfettered access to ALL national security information.
He is afforded powers unlike any other individual on earth. His finger rests on the Red button and his office is respected and revered around the globe. He is the international representative of every American citizen.
Such an office cannot be held by one with even the potential for dual or divided loyalties. The international pressure to act upon global interests instead of American interests is immense. Only one with completely undivided loyalties can be trusted. He MUST be a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires.
Above all else, the Founding Father’s feared a despotic central government that would one day turn its abusive power on its people. They went to great pains to design a Representative Republic limited in scope and power by constitutional text that would best secure the people against such an event, including Article II -Section I, intended to keep leaders with foreign loyalties from ever holding the broadest power on earth.
Then, they told us to alter or abolish any government that became a threat to Life, Liberty or the pursuit of Happiness.
They were “extremists. ” They didn’t trust central power and they sure didn’t trust that power in the hands of someone with dual or divided loyalties.
Why the “Birther” Movement is EXPLODING! Demonstrated by plummeting approval ratings only six months into office, the American people have seen enough of Obama’s “global” agenda, at odds with American interest, and what was once “hope” for “change” six months ago, has become fear, anger and discontent. Obama took office six months ago with a +28 point strong approval rating. Six months later, Obama finds himself at a -12 point approval rating, an unprecedented 40 point swing!
The Obama administration has named more unelected Czars in six months than pre-Soviet Russia named in its thousand year existence. They have forced industries into bankruptcy only to emerge the property of the federal government. They are ramming Marxist laws through a leftist congress so fast that members of congress don’t even have time to read them before they pass.
Members of congress are now afraid to hold town meetings for fear of being attacked by angry constituents who have had enough of watching DC elitists run roughshod over the other side of the aisle, the states and the American people. ( http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090731/pl_politico/25646 )
There are TWO reasons why the “birther” movement is EXPLODING instead of going away, despite daily attacks and name calling from the lamestream press.
· The Constitution, including Article II -Section I either stands or it doesn’t.
· The people are watching the utter hourly destruction of their nation in Washington DC and they need a peaceful way to end that destruction legally, before things become violent.
The flaw in the left’s plan to change the Unites States into a secular socialist One World Order is they have foolishly underestimated the desire for freedom and liberty in the hearts and minds of
They have miscalculated… The 22.4% of the population who voted for Marxism in the last two election cycles thought that they won the right to shove Marxism down the throats of every American. They are horrifically mistaken…
By launching a heavy handed all-out assault on individual freedom and liberty from every possible front at breakneck speed, they have sent the nation into shock and dismay. Even many, who foolishly voted for the mystery messiah last November, are now jumping ship after watching him make a mockery of the US Constitution and the principles and values that made America the greatest free nation ever known to mankind.
The people need to right the ship and remove every anti-American fraud from the halls of the federal government before things get really ugly. Afraid to confront their constituents, law-makers are running for cover. When representatives stop listening to the people they work for, the people will stop talking and start acting!
If Obama is a “constitutional” president, he is going to have to prove it and fast. If not, he is going to have to leave the people’s White House, in handcuffs if need be! The issue will not go away. The Constitution stands or all bets are off!
Every member of his administration and his party who had knowledge of, participated in or provided cover for the greatest hoax every perpetrated on the American people, must step down with him.
The people will have to figure out what to do next, but one thing is certain, - this “silent coup” will not stand much longer. The walls are closing in and Obama & Co. are trapped in their own massive web of deceit.
People do NOT spend a million dollars to hide something that there is no reason to hide.
The inescapable reality is this… - We have an unconstitutional resident of the White House and a whole lot of people working around the clock to keep him in office, for God only knows what purpose.
Although 22.4% of Americans don’t seem to care about that, millions of American “birthers” do, as did the Founding Fathers.
Sooner or later, Obama is going to have to prove that he is legitimate. The longer it takes for him to come forward and do so, the more dangerous the situation will become, as citizens grow increasingly angry over the utter destruction of their country.
The truth exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records. Nobody hides the truth unless the truth will expose a lie…
Even Obama’s political allies had better start calling for the truth and fast, or they will sink with him! The Founders had it right and on that basis alone, so do the “birthers.”
We’re keeping a list of all who have chosen badly…
“Birther” Issue EXPLODES!
Leftist O-Bots Become Vicious!
By JB Williams Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Just yesterday, I released Obama Media Machine Rushing to Derail Treason Charges and the
column went viral within moments of its release. Take a few minutes to read my up-to-date report on the issue driving the Obama White House, congressional Marxists and their media minions insane!
Within hours, every network news agency was in damage control mode, spinning their twisted set of false facts and missing evidence into a demonstration of unbridled outrage aimed at American citizens who simply want to know who the mystery messiah is, residing in their White House.
Are “birthers” Getting too close for Comfort? The White House rushed out its media talking points memo – CBS Hotsheet explains the Birther movement here. in O-bot terms. The state controlled alphabet propaganda networks jumped on the DNC talking points immediately, with a vengeance. The “birthers” (aka constitutionally conscious) are the target of vicious broad based attacks, usually only found on left-wing blogs like the toxic Democratic Underground or DailyKos!
Meanwhile, House members in congress quietly rushed through H.R. 593, under the guise of “Recognizing and celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State” – which included this phrase, “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;” [See H.R. 593 here -:]
The not-so-subtle rush to end the debate over Obama’s lack of Constitutional standing to be President and Commander-in-Chief, begs the question, -- if what you say is true, wouldn’t access to Obama’s secret files have answered the question, without the need for an act of congress? I thought congress had “10,000 more important things to do,” according to Robert Gibbs.
If Obama is a “Natural Born Citizen” – Why Can’t he Prove it? Why use an act of congress, backed by NO authentic evidence whatsoever, to establish that which would be easily proven (or disproved) by the release of ALL Obama birth, adoption, college and passport records? What’s in these records that Obama is afraid to release for public access?
H.R. 593 passed with 56 co-sponsors, 220 Democrat YEAs, 158 Republican YEAs and NO NEAs… What’s with the unanimous congressional rush to end the debate over Obama’s sealed records? What happened to the “transparent president” promise?
Even “Right-wing” Pundits are Running for Cover
Ann Coulter . Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly are also carrying water for Obama by downplaying the “birther” (aka constitutionally concerned citizen) demand to know who the mystery messiah really is…
What’s in Obama’s records, that is so dangerous to his current standing, that NOBODY wants to open those files? Whatever it is, members of the House would rather pass a resolution declaring Obama a “citizen” than ask him to open those files… Why?
Real Conspiracy or Just a Theory? As I pointed out in yesterday column, “the real truth actually does exist and it most likely exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records, [Not some silly symbolic House resolution] - all of which remain under lock and key, under Obama’s orders.”
Instead of simply opening those records and ending the debate, Obama has chosen to spend a million bucks keeping those records locked up and now, House members have decided to pass a non-binding resolution declaring Obama a “citizen” without first demanding to see the evidence necessary to prove their claim.
This is the stuff that real conspiracies are made of. It’s not a “theory” that the Natural Born Citizen clause is a Constitutional requirement for the presidency, it’s a reality.
It’s not a theory that Obama’s records will either prove or disprove his eligibility for office, it’s a fact.
And it’s not a theory that when someone works this hard to hide something, there must be something worth hiding.
Robert Gibbs Lame Parsing of Words
Reacting once again to press corps softballs tossed up for Gibbs to hit out of the park, White House press secretary Gibbs parsed his words very carefully.
CBS News reports – “Gibbs lashed out Monday at the so-called “birthers” who believe President Obama is not a legal U.S. citizen despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
Notice the absence of the term “natural born citizen.” Gibbs and CBS both know that we are NOT discussing “legal US citizenship” but rather the Founder’s “natural born citizen” requirement, unique to the Oval Office. They also know that these two terms have VERY different meanings and purposes. Still, Gibbs tries to deflect the debate to one over “US citizenship,” and CBS quickly follows his lead.
Further, what Gibbs and the lamestream press agree is “overwhelming evidence”—is THREE different COLBs (certificates of live birth) presented by Team Obama, and TWO different hospitals, named by Obama as his official place of birth.
No mention of the sworn affidavit signed by Obama’s family in Kenya, which states that they
were present at Obama’s birth in Kenya, or the fact that not a single hospital in Hawaii will confirm that Obama or his mother ever entered the door of their facility.
No mention of the fact that Obama was adopted and became a legal citizen of Indonesia in his youth. No mention that no US passport record exists for Obama, until he was given a diplomatic passport as an Illinois Senator.
What is the “overwhelming evidence” that leads Gibbs, the press and now congress to conclude that Barack Hussein Obama meets the “natural born citizen” requirement to be Commander-in-Chief?
NO such evidence has been presented, as ALL Obama birth, adoption, college and passport records remain sealed as of this writing. What evidence are they talking about? The evidence that Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen” is beyond “overwhelming.”
Gibbs stated in the press briefing, “If I had some DNA, it wouldn’t assuage those who don’t believe he was born here,” he said. “But I have news for them and for all of us: The president was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, the 50th state of the greatest country on the face of the Earth. He’s a citizen.”
What does DNA have to do with it? Would DNA prove Obama was born in Hawaii?
Obama has openly admitted to being the son of a British subject. No DNA test is needed to establish the identity of Obama’s father, is it? And DNA would not establish whether or not he was born in one of the two Hawaiian hospitals he has named as his place of birth. The DNA comment is nothing more than another cute effort to misdirect…
If the president was indeed “born in Honolulu,” just open the records. Let’s talk to his doctors and nurses and put an end to this mess. End of discussion!
He may indeed be “a citizen,” which of course has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not he is a “natural born citizen” in accordance with the purpose of the “natural born citizen” clause.
California Governor Arnold Swartzenager is a “US citizen,” but he is NOT a “natural born citizen” and cannot run for US President as a result. Unless he prints up a fake Hawaiian COLB, I suppose.
What is a Natural Born Citizen?
“There are 10,000 more important issues for people in this country to discuss rather than whether or not the president is a citizen, when it’s been proven ad nauseum,” Gibbs added.
This is what Bill Clinton said right after saying; “I did not have sex with that girl, Monica Lewinsky.” And of course, like Hillary Clinton at the time, Robert Gibbs hopes to misdirect attention away from the fact that NO evidence has been presented confirming Obama’s status to date, focusing attention upon “right-wing conspiracy” theories of his own imagination.
But the subject is really quite simple… To know with certainty what the Founders meant by “natural born citizen,” one need look no further than the “natural law” at the foundation of everything they did.
Natural law says, when a father has a son, the son is the “natural born” descendent of the father, assuming his sir name and his citizenship by “birth right.” No man-made law is needed to establish the “birth rights” of the son.
The Founder’s used the “natural born citizen” clause to avoid any obvious conflicts in the Oval Office resulting from dual, divided or questionable loyalties to any foreign government or nation.
In Obama’s case, no matter whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya, he cannot meet the Founder’s constitutional standard because he was born the son of an Arab-Muslim British subject from Africa, and therefore, has obvious dual or divided loyalties, which are now easily demonstrated by his “global agenda” at odds with American interests.
No Room to Run House Resolution 593 is NOT binding. It is only symbolic.
Still it demonstrates the lengths to which the federal government, both Democrats and Republicans, are willing to go to avoid whatever hard evidence on the matter might exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records.
Now, as the American people have been repeatedly denied access to the truth which exists only in Obama’s secret files, the people are left to their “theories” about what might be in those files and how damning it might be.
Clearly, the “birther” movement has hit full stride and investigators are getting too close for comfort. Hence the all-out media blitz of vicious attacks on “birthers” – baseless accusations of “racism” and non-binding congressional measures, all aimed at derailing the citizen effort to unmask the mystery messiah.
This is the ONLY “evidence” offered by the White House as of today. According to Gibbs, it’s “overwhelming” in nature… You decide!
Note: Any alterations invalidate this certificate. The mere fact that this document has been “altered” by blocking out the official certificate number means that the document is “invalid.”
Come on boys and girls. Why the kindergarten level debate?
Just open the man’s files. If he has nothing to hide, why are you all working to hard to hide it?
Federal judge dismisses reservist's suit questioning Obama's presidency BY LILY GORDON - email@example.com.
Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009
A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S. Army reservist who says he shouldn't have to go to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama was never eligible to be president.
Judge Clay Land sided with the defense, which claimed in its response to Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook's suit, filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, that Cook’s suit is “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.
"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."
Cook arrived at the federal courthouse in uniform this morning for his hearing.
Outside the courthouse, before the hearing, Cook defended his controversial position and declared his devotion to the military.
“I love the Army and I want to continue to serve in the Army,” Cook said. “If we can establish that he is in fact president of the United States legally, I’m on the airplane the next day over to Afghanistan… if they cut my deployment orders, so I can do the job that I want to do.”
Cook said following orders made by an illegitimate superior could ultimately lead to his prosecution, or worse.
“If one cannot establish the validity and legality of the order. we would be following illegal orders and subject to prosecution,” he said. “I could be prosecuted by the Uniform Code of Military Justice and if captured I would not be privy to protections under the Geneva Convention.”
Other soldiers have been supportive of his position, Cook said.
“I’ve received quite a bit of popular support from officers in my grade and some officers a grade above and some officers a grade below,” he said. “Thus far, I’d say about 90 percent positive.”
Cook was accompanied by his attorney, Orly Taitz, who has challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other courts. Two similar suits have previously been thrown out of federal court.
Ledger-enquirer.com will have more on this breaking story later this afternoon.